|
Mandrel-tip Pliers For the beaded chain projects in the second book, I assisted Swanstrom Tool Company in developing these Mandrel-tip pliers. As shown, one mandrel jaw is a consistent 3.1mm and the other jaw is a consistent 3.9mm diameter. This gives my students and me the ability to wrap perfect double-loop bead settings. There is a second version of this Mandrel-tip pliers, which has a 3.5mm and a 4.5mm jaw, as shown below. |
| |
|
|
19-gauge Mandrel-tip
Pliers 3.1/3.9mm - $65
|
18-gauge Mandrel-tip
Pliers 3.5/4.5mm - $65 |
| |
|
![]() |
![]() |
| The first version of the Mandrel-tip
pliers, labeled ‘3.1/3.9’, with a 3.1mm and 3.9mm jaws
is specific to working with 19-gauge round wire, as described below.
The second version of the of the Mandrel-tip pliers, labeled ‘3.5/4.5’,
with a 3.5mm and 4.5mm jaws is specific to working with larger 18-gauge
round wire, as described below. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
The 3.9mm jaw is the proper inside
diameter of the 19g Inca Puño jump ring, this jaw allows the
wrapping of a consistent double-loop of wire to set a gemstone bead
into the 19g Inca Puño chain, see 19-gauge
Beaded Inca Puño bracelet tutorial. |
![]() |
Coming Soon |
|
The 4.5mm jaw is the proper inside
diameter of the 18g Inca Puño, 16g Byzantine, and 14g Double
chain jump ring, this jaw allows the wrapping of a consistent double-loop
of wire to set a gemstone bead into any of these three chain patterns,
see tutorial. |
| |
|
New Mandrel-tip
Pliers vs. Traditional Round-nose Pliers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
In the first book (page
63), I illustrated how to mark a specific diameter on the tapered
round-nose pliers, as shown top left. The 18-gauge bronze wire is
then hand wrapped into a double-loop, keeping each bend of the wire
exactly at the marked diameter for a consistent inside diameter to
the double-loop, as shown top right. This consistency allows the bead
setting to be assembled into a chain pattern that has the identically
sized jump rings for a seamless connection. However, maintaining hand
wrapped consistency on the tapered round-nose jaw is easier said than
executed, and these inconsistencies begin to amplify as the bead settings
get more integrated into the chain pattern, as shown in the next example. |
|
| |
|
Why is the specific
inner diameter of a bead setting necessary? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
The image at top right shows the
culmination of spiraling three rings connecting each bead setting;
requiring each double-loop to have space for six rings to travel through
it. Problems arose if any of the double-loops were a pinch too small,
as their inner diameter would not allow the addition of the third
rings to complete each Flower formation. Furthermore, any inconsistency
in diameter sizing can cause the overall chain to be stiff and lose
flexibility. |
| |
|
As a conscientious educator,
I felt the need to simplify these bead-setting techniques for my students.
The implementation of this tool into my workshops has greatly diminished
frustrations and increased smiles of each satisfied participant with
a bracelet on their wrist. To these ends, the consistent diameter
jaws of the Mandrel-tip pliers have been absolutely paramount. |
|